The canadian government gets it

Content 38 39 10 11 12 13 15 17 Add person btn .add-person-btn display: inline-block; width: 40px; height: 34px; border: 0; outline: 0; padding: 0; margin: 0;

Content Rachel Sharp WrrrdNrrrdGrrrl V An older woman came into the bookstore today. I made a joke about a credit card reader issue and she said "these things are all programmed by twenty-five-year- old boys who don't comment their code" and somehow we ended up having a great conversation about programming and biases. 11:47 PM Feb 1, 2020 Twitter for Android 1.4K Retweets 15.2K Likes 1

Content every element in the array gets a this label is a numeric value, which we call an index the first element has the index 0 Aw look how cute Arrays start at index 1 Oh no It's retarded

When your operating system manual casually transitions from "Having Children" to "Watching Your Children Die" in the process management section, you know you're dealing with some dark humor. The meme brilliantly plays on the parallel between human relationships and computer processes. In Unix/Linux systems, a parent process "forks" to create child processes, and sometimes has to "kill" them or watch them "die" when they misbehave. That section on "Killing Yourself" is just process termination, but out of context? Pure psychopath energy. No wonder developers stare blankly into the void sometimes—we're just following the documentation.

Content copilot was spitting here 40 Why Not No-Code Drag and Drop? 41 42 There have been millions of opinion articles written on this already, so I will keep the argument short. The problem with programming was never the language pr the syntax. The problem with programming is that it's hard to learn. It's hard to learn because it's hard to teach. It's hard to teach because it's hard to explain. It's hard to explain because it's hard to understand. It's hard to understand because it's hard to visualize. It's hard to visualize because it's hard to see the big picture. It's hard to see the big picture because it's hard to see the small picture. It's hard to see the small picture because it's hard to see the details. It's hard to see the details because it's hard to see the code. It's hard to see the code because it's hard to read the code. It's hard to read the code because it's hard to write the code. It's hard to write the code because it's hard to think of the code. It's hard to think of the code because it's hard to think of the problem. It's hard to think of the problem because it's hard to think of the solution. It's hard to think of the solution because it's hard to think of the idea. It's hard to think of the idea because it's hard to think. It's hard to think because it's hard to think. ProarammerHumor.io

Ah, the duality of random number generation! The top panel shows the proper way—importing libraries like random , time , or os to generate proper pseudo-random numbers with good entropy. The bottom panel reveals the chaotic evil approach—hardcoding your "random" generator without external input, which is basically just saying return 4 because it was randomly chosen by fair dice roll. Guaranteed to be random! The twisted face in the second panel perfectly captures the deranged energy of a developer who thinks Math.floor(Math.random() * 6) + 1 is too much work and opts for const getRandomNumber = () => 4; instead. Cryptographers are screaming somewhere.