Quick Status Update

The difference between how versioning should work and how it actually works in some codebases. According to semantic versioning, you increment the major version (like 1.0 to 2.0) when you make changes that break backward compatibility. But then there's that one developer who breaks something with literally every commit and somehow still has a job. Their changelog probably just reads "Fixed stuff, broke other stuff" for every release. It's basically the software development equivalent of playing Russian roulette with a fully loaded gun.

Content Me, after coding for hours with 0 human interaction just to make an obscure module

Content When I wrote this code, only God I understood what it did. SUS Now... onlv God knows.

Content Sunday June 12, 2016 DILBERT I SIMPLIFIED THE USER INTERFACE AS YOU SUGGESTED YOU HOLD THE BUTTON FOR EXACTLY FIVE SECONDS. ProarammerHumor.io DilbertCartoonistgmail.com YOU WANTED ONE BUTTON TO DO ELEVEN DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS THEN DOUBLE-TAP, AND DOUBLE-TAP AGAIN. THEN HOLD FOR EXACTLY SIX SECONDS. IT WASN'T EASY, BT I THINK YOUiL BE PLEASED. THEN PRESS IT ALL THE WAY DOWN, THEN HALFWAY UP, THEN 27 BACK DOWN. AND HOLD FOR NINE SECONDS. BY SCOTT ADAMS IF YOU WANT TO TURN UP THE VOLUME OR YOU COULD ADMIT THAT YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT INTERFACE DESIGN. NEVER!

Content ME WAITING FOR THE COMPILER TO FINISH AFTER CHANGING THE PUNCTUATION OF A COMMENT

Content my manager not understanding what I did me explaining my code which I dont understand