Dont Delete

Ah, the classic regex email validation bell curve. The sweet spot of sanity sits right in the middle where people use a simple EMAIL.CONTAINS('@') check and call it a day. On the low IQ end, you've got folks using the same basic check, blissfully unaware of the horrors that await. On the high IQ end, you've got the regex wizards who've stared into the abyss of RFC 5322 compliance and returned with that monstrosity at the top of the image. After 15 years in the industry, I've come to accept that email validation is like quicksand—the harder you fight for perfection, the deeper you sink. Just check for an @ symbol and move on with your life. Your sanity will thank you.

Content "OLD (ODES" When it comes to maintaining old codes . . . 's like exploring the depths of an old tomb coo The hell is this archaic bullshit?? Ah... the rich history The marvels achieved by those who came before us HTTPS:TAPAS.I0SERIESGRUMPY-CODES CARDBOARDUOICE

When you code based on "vibes" instead of best practices, your app security ends up looking like Swiss cheese. Full of holes. Vulnerable to attack. But hey, at least it compiled on the first try, right? The number of security vulnerabilities is directly proportional to how many times you said "this feels right" while coding.

Content Kat Maddox ctrishifti - 43m V you can tell that someone doesn't actually use javascript if all they do is talk about how much they hate it. the people who do use javascript are quiet; they know it's listening 921 1782 607 1.

The mystical art of "just recompiling" is the software equivalent of turning it off and on again. That shocked Pikachu face is all of us when our broken code suddenly works after doing absolutely nothing to fix it. The real horror isn't when it fails—it's when it succeeds for reasons you'll never understand. The coding gods simply decided to be merciful today. Tomorrow? You're on your own.

When you ask two AI models the same basic math question and get completely opposite answers. Deepseek correctly identifies that 9.9 > 9.11 (treating them as decimals), while ChatGPT somehow thinks 9.11 > 9.9. This is why we still have jobs. For now. Nothing says "trust me with your critical systems" like failing elementary school math. Somewhere, a software engineer is using this screenshot in their slide deck titled "Why Human QA Still Matters".