While loop

Content Paying for premium features Developing them yourself

The ultimate Java fix for anything broken: slap a logo on it and watch the magic happen! Just like how adding more dependencies somehow fixes your code without you understanding why. Sure, your vacuum might be running at 2% efficiency and consuming 98% of your electricity bill, but hey—at least it's technically working. Classic enterprise solution: don't fix the underlying problem, just wrap it in 17 layers of abstraction until it barely functions again.

Content I found an effective alternative for agile model.. What? yuva.krishna.memes Let's go back to Waterfall model.. Atleast developers had a life

The evolution of infinite loops from "acceptable" to "summoning Satan himself": First panel: while (true) {} - The classic approach. Clean, honest, straightforward. "Yes, I'm creating an infinite loop on purpose. What about it?" Second panel: while (["*"].Contains["*"]) {} - Getting spicy! The unnecessary complexity is like wearing a tuxedo to take out the trash. It still does the same thing, but with style . Third panel: while (Random.Int(Integer.MaxInt) is Number) {} - Now we're just being passive-aggressive. "It's not technically infinite... but it is." The programming equivalent of "I'm not touching you!" Final panel: while (DateTime.Now - Breaking the fabric of space-time. This isn't just bad code, it's a cry for help. The compiler isn't even mad anymore, just disappointed.

Content Emma Wedekind EmmaWedekind Me: Posts photo of computer Tech Twitter: Zooms in super far to seedestroy code "Well actually your solution isn't optimal. The run time is exponential when you could do this in linear time. Also you should not use ifelse statements but switch statements for readability"

Content THE TWO STATES OF EVERY PROGRAMMER TAMA GOD. I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT I'M DOING.