Huh Iwonder What Happened There

Content THIS IS YOUR MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM? YUP! YOU POUR THE DATA INTO THIS BIG PILE OF LINEAR ALGEBRA, THEN COLLECT THE ANSWERS ON THE OTHER SIDE. WHAT IF THE ANSWERS ARE WRONG? JUST STIR THE PILE UNTiL THEY START LOOKING RIGHT. SaTA ANSWERS ProgrammerHumor.:

Content You'd make everything static right 10:41 M So that everything can belong to the class 10:41 J 3 10:41 M Damn right I would 10:42 I dont like object oriented 10:42 because the classes have too much power over the methods 10:42 It creates a hierachical structure that I disagree with 10:42

[text] PR ek s S

Content Static Typing Static Typing w Type Inference dYnaMic TyPinG 1f69bac4df

Ah yes, the infamous "I Promise To Cleanup After The Refactor" bridge. Just like how every developer swears they'll come back and clean up their temporary hacks after shipping the feature. Five years later, that "quick fix" is now a load-bearing monstrosity that nobody dares to touch. The bridge is still standing though, so technically it works in production! And just like legacy code, it's covered in the vines of technical debt that keep growing while management insists on building new features on top. Remember folks, temporary solutions are the most permanent architectural decisions you'll ever make.

Ah, the gentle bedtime reading for Linux developers—a chapter on "Process Primitives" that escalates from "Having Children" (fork() calls) to "Watching Your Children Die" (handling terminated child processes) in approximately 0.2 seconds. The progression from spawning processes to murdering them, with a nostalgic pit stop at vfork() for the greybeards, perfectly captures the existential horror that is Linux process management. Nothing says "totally normal operating system" like documentation that reads like a serial killer's manifesto. And they wonder why therapists ask Linux developers if they're "killing children" at work.