Good parenting 👍

Behold, the official uniform of LinkedIn influencers who think "data scientist" is a personality trait. Nothing says "I'm professionally insufferable" quite like broadcasting your childhood dreams of transforming unstructured data into actionable business insights. Because normal kids were dreaming about dinosaurs and spaceships while you were apparently fantasizing about pivot tables and KPIs. The only thing this cap is missing is "passionate about synergizing cross-functional deliverables" and a random Python snippet tattooed on the brim.

Asking how to check LLM code quality without being an expert is like asking how to check if your parachute works without jumping out of a plane. The irony is delicious - you're using an LLM to ask how to evaluate LLM-generated code. It's the digital equivalent of asking a toddler if they think they should have more candy. The answer is always "yes" and always suspiciously in their favor.

Content 3 HOURS LATER Thanks for watching my Live Coding Stream TOREG, Byece VIEWERS: O

Content Hey Robot, what do you do when I am not around? System32Comics Oh just robot stuff USB hub USB 3.0 M 02:23 04:12 v Transferrina 200GB of data 582k 11 212 System32Comics

Content i i 1 increment counter i i 1 Increment the counter by one i i 1 Increase the value of the counter, which is the variable i, by 1. 1 1 1 Take the number stored inside the variable i', which is the counter, and add another value to it (the other value '1' in this case), so that the program doesn't get stuck in an endless loop that will never stop looping unless you interrupt the program or you shut down your computer, in which case the looping will cease, but only until you decide to run the program again and the looping once again starts and runs endlessly without any way to stop, besides the two ways already mentioned above.

The ancient tech shamans have spoken! Apparently, computers aren't just silicon and circuits—they're temperamental deities demanding respect and offerings. Ever notice how your perfectly functional code suddenly implodes when someone else watches? Or how that printer works flawlessly for the IT guy but transforms into a demonic entity when you approach? That's not coincidence—that's you lacking sufficient "computer mana." The true masters of debugging don't actually fix anything. They just walk into the room with their mythical aura of computer respect, and suddenly everything works. No code changes, no hardware fixes—just pure technological intimidation. Next time your build fails, try whispering sweet nothings to your compiler instead of checking Stack Overflow.