Unintelligible Text

Content IVE FINALLY FOUND IT. AFTER 15 Hours The reason my code doesn't work Robotatertotco1 You're using angle degrees instead of radians

Writing incomprehensible code isn't a bug—it's a feature. That senior dev who writes cryptic one-liners with zero comments? They're not sloppy; they're building their legend. Nothing says job security like being the only one who can decipher your own arcane syntax. Sure, your code review might be a disaster, but at least they'll remember your name when the production server catches fire at 3 AM and you're the only one who can fix it. Infamous is still famous in git blame.

Content MRandom Returns a 6-25s number const unsigned char rndtable 256 0, 8, 109, 220, 222, 241, 149, 107, 75, 248, 254, 140, 16, 66, 74, 21, 211, 47, 80, 242, 154, 27, 205, 128, 161, 89, 77, 36, 95, 110, 85, 48, 212, 140, 211, 249, 22, 79, 200, 50, 28, 188 , 52, 140, 202, 120, 68, 145, 62, 70, 184, 190, 91, 197, 152, 224 , 149, 104, 25, 178, 252, 182, 202, 182, 141, 197, 4, 81, 181, 242, 145, 42, 39, 227, 156, 198, 225, 193, 219, 93, 122, 175, 249, 0, 175, 143, 70, 239, 46, 246, 163, 53, 163, 109, 168, 135, 2, 235, 25, 92, 20, 145, 138, 77, 69, 166, 78, 176, 173, 212, 166, 113 , 94, 161, 41, 50, 239, 49, 111, 164, 70, 60, 2, 37, 171, 75 , 136, 156, 11, 56, 42, 146, 138, 229, 73, 146, 77, 61, 98, 196, 135, 106, 63, 197, 195, 86, 96, 203, 113, 101, 170, 247, 181, 113, 80, 250, 108, 7, 255, 237, 129, 226, 79, 107, 112, 166, 103, 241. 24, 223, 239, 120, 198, 58, 60, 82, 128, 3, 184, 66, 143, 224, 145, 224, 81, 206, 163, 45, 63, 90, 168, 114, 59, 33, 159, 95, 28, 139, 123, 98, 125, 196, 15, 70, 194, 253, 54, 14, 109, 226 , 71, 17, 161, 93, 186, 87, 244, 138, 20, 52, 123, 251, 26, 36. 17, 46, 52, 231, 232, 76, 31, 221, 84, 37, 216, 165, 212, 106 , 197, 242, 98, 43, 39, 175, 254, 145, 190, 84, 118, 222, 187, 136 , 120, 163, 236, 249

Ah, the classic NumPy paradox: np.nan == np.nan returns False . Because apparently even NaN doesn't want to be associated with itself. Just like that one developer who wrote this code and now refuses to acknowledge it in code reviews. The screaming title perfectly captures that moment when you spend 3 hours debugging only to discover your data analysis is failing because Not-a-Number isn't equal to... itself. It's not a bug, it's a feature – said no data scientist ever.

Content Mayank M dermayank 1d Developer: We have a problem, MySQL is down. Manager: Then use somebody else's SQL 113 17 1,000 5,020 1.

Content Wes Bos wesbos 1h casually scans 800,000 lines of code LGTM nics Industries Technologv Politics Wealth Pursuits Opinion Tesla Engineers Visit Twitt Review Code for Musk 62 17. 220 1,964