This is bad. But here you go (stolen from insta)

The eternal developer lifecycle reduced to its purest form—eat, sleep, code, repeat. But wait! Some brilliant mind points out the critical bug in this algorithm: no poop() function. The reply is pure genius with its "PoopOverflow" pun—a hilarious riff on Stack Overflow, every developer's second home. It's like warning someone their memory leak will eventually crash the human operating system. The most realistic code review I've seen in years. No comments about architecture or design patterns—just straight to the biological requirements that no programmer can ignore. Nature's pull request always gets priority.

Welcome to the thunderdome of naming conventions, where senior devs battle to the death over camelCase vs snake_case while the junior dev sits in the corner naming variables like they're randomly hitting the keyboard. Nothing triggers developers more than variable names. Two senior devs locked in mortal combat over updatedNumber vs numberToBeUpdated is just Tuesday at most companies. Meanwhile, the junior dev is off creating digital war crimes with aa1 and xyz - blissfully unaware they're violating every coding standard since FORTRAN. Code reviews aren't about finding bugs anymore—they're just elaborate ceremonies where we pretend variable naming is worth physical violence.

So Microsoft brags about 30% of their code being AI-generated, then pushes an update that kills your SSD. Coincidence? I think not. This is what happens when you let GitHub Copilot write your disk I/O routines. Next update will probably require a blood sacrifice and your firstborn child just to boot up. Remember when updates just fixed things instead of creating exciting new problems? Those were the days...

Content NORMAL DISTRIBUTION PARANORMAL DISTRIBUTION

Content Dev team, there is something causing a bug! Source code ProdrammerHumor.io

Content Cool new side project PAGELOW 2018 Ryan Pagelow BUNICON