Startup wants to solve tech worker shortage problem.

When your code is on fire but you've already committed to the "move fast and break things" philosophy. The AI is like "no no no, everything is still bricked from your last change" and the developer's brilliant solution? "Great idea, let's build Dark Mode!" Because nothing says "I'm addressing the root problem" like slapping a new coat of paint on a burning building. It's the digital equivalent of putting a Band-Aid on a severed limb and saying "fixed it!" Classic developer priorities—who needs functional code when you can have aesthetic darkness?

Content Currently Al can write code snippets based on inputs ..hmm so we can save cost of recruiting junior devs. yuva.krishna.memes In future Al can write whole software ..hmm so I can also save cost of recruiting senior devs.. One day Al will run my whole company and fire all redundant humans

The classic "drop the mic and walk away" but with spaghetti code. Nothing says "not my problem anymore" like committing a nested 500-line function with zero comments right before your two weeks notice. Future maintainers will be naming conference talks after this guy: "The Legacy of Chad's Monolith: A Postmortem."

Ah, the classic race condition joke that haunts every multi-threaded developer's nightmares! Thread 1: "knock knock" Thread 2: "who's there?" Thread 1: "race condition" But in reality, it executes as: "knock knock" "race condition" "who's there?" The punchline arrives before the setup—just like that bug that only appears in production at 3 AM when you're finally getting some sleep. Concurrency: where the answer might show up before you've even asked the question.

Ah, the classic "passwords don't match" error that appears before you've even finished typing. It's like having a backseat driver for your form inputs. This is precisely why frontend devs invented the onBlur event instead of onKeyDown for validation. One patiently waits until you're done with the field, the other screams at you while you're still thinking. It's the digital equivalent of someone finishing your sentences incorrectly, then calling you wrong. The rage is justified. Form validation timing is the hill many users are willing to die on at 4:54 AM.

Content Warmup-1 near hundred prev next chance Given an int n, return True if it is within 10 of 100 or 200. Note: abs(num) computes the absolure vale ora number nearhundred(93) - True nearhundred(90) - True nearhundred(89) - False Go def near hundred(n): if n 93: return True 1f n as 90: return True if n 110: return True if n as 190: return True if n as 209: return True if n as 191: return True if n as 200: return True if n 210: return True return False .. Save, Compile, Run (ctri-enter) Show Solution Go Editor font size : 100 Shorter output Expected nearhundred(93) - True Run True OK nearhundred(90) - True True OK near hundred(89) - False False OK nearhundred(110) - True True OK near hundred(111) - False False OK nearhundred(121) - False False OK near hundred(-101) - False False OK nearhundred(-209) - False False OK nearhundred(190) - True nearhundred(209) - True True OK True OK nearhundred(0) - False False OK nearhundred(5) - False False OK near hundred(-50) - False False OK nearhundred(191) - True True OK nearhundred(189) - False False OK nearhundred(200) - True True OK near hundred(210) - True True OK near hundred(211) - False False OK near hundred(290) - False False OK All Correct