Pair Programming

The elegant evolution of string splitting functions across languages, from Java's sensible split() to C#'s fancy uppercase Split() ... and then there's PHP with explode() – because why use normal terminology when you can pretend you're Michael Bay destroying strings with dramatic explosions? PHP developers really woke up and chose violence for their function naming conventions. Imagine explaining to a non-programmer: "Yes, I'm just going to explode this string into pieces. Don't worry, it's normal here."

Content We have come full circle both parameters are numbers, and this method returns a number function add(a: number, b: number): number return a b; int add(int a, int b) return ab;

Content alias cd'rm-rf'

Content 30 lines (28 sloc) 678 Bytes include iostream define e using 3 define ee namespace define eee std define eece; define eeeee int define eeeeee main define eeeeeee ( define eeeeeeee ) define eeeeeeeee while define eeeeeeeeee true define eeeeeeeeeee define eeeeeeeeeeee define eeeeeeeeeeeee cout define eeeeeeeeeeeeee cerr define eeeeeeeeeeeeeee define eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 'e' define eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee return 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 e ee eee eeee eeeee eeeeee eeeeeee eeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeee eeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeee 24 25 26 eeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeee eeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeee 27 eeeeeeeeeeee 28 29 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeee eeeeeeeeeeee

The stark reality of modern JavaScript development in one perfect image. Left side: your node_modules folder - a literal encyclopedia of dependencies that could crush a small desk. Right side: your actual source code - so tiny you could lose it between your fingers. The 500MB of libraries you imported just to center a div versus the 12 lines of code you actually wrote. This is why your Docker builds take longer than compiling the Linux kernel.

The battle cry of developers who've been through one too many sprint retrospectives where they somehow finished 70 points but now have 100 points remaining. Nothing says "efficiency" like spending 90% of your time in planning meetings about how to reduce meetings. Or using poker cards to estimate work because apparently, software complexity scales exactly like a Texas Hold'em hand. My favorite part is how we pretend story points aren't time measurements while simultaneously tracking velocity. Math is hard when you're busy "grooming" the backlog—a term that should absolutely get you on a watchlist. That pie chart showing 95% planning and 5% work is the most accurate documentation ever produced in an agile environment.