Me convincing the testing team about the quality of my code

Technical interviews these days are basically survival combat with a grizzly bear while the actual job is just playing with Winnie the Pooh. Nothing says "modern tech hiring" like being mauled by algorithm questions you'll never use again, only to spend your career copying from Stack Overflow and asking ChatGPT to explain regex. The bear should be wearing a "Binary Tree Traversal" t-shirt for accuracy.

The four horsemen of privacy apocalypse, ranked by self-awareness: Microsoft: Caught red-handed, frantically trying damage control. Google: "We're the good guys because we only harvest your browsing data, not everything ." Apple: "Yes we spy, but we told you in paragraph 347 of the EULA you definitely read." Linux: The vegan CrossFitter of operating systems. Doesn't spy and can't shut up about it.

Content IMPLEMENTATION IT'S AMAZINg HOW SUCH A SMALL THING CAN DO SO MUCH! E DEPENDENCIES MONKEYUSER.COM

Content A FEATURE THE CLIENT WANTS BACK INTO THE BACKLOG M M, M THE DEV WHO FOUGHT TOOTH AND NAIL TO GET RID OF THE FEATURE

Content her: it's (me not and (me not and the dog)) not and ((me not and the dog) not and the dog) my programming ass:

That hand gesture says everything a developer's words can't. The moment a product manager utters "I had a really good idea for a new feature that would be fun," your deadline just grew another month, your architecture just got more bloated, and your weekend plans just vanished into the void. The universal developer defense mechanism kicks in—stop that idea before it reaches a Jira ticket or worse... gets mentioned to the CEO. No amount of coffee can prepare you for the impending scope creep tsunami that follows those innocent-sounding words.