I m literally getting old it seems

Ah, the classic Java hater's paradox. First panel: "Java error messages are too long to understand anything!" with a stack trace that would make War and Peace look like a tweet. Second panel: The same person happily embracing C's cryptic "Segmentation fault" - which is basically the programming equivalent of your car making a weird noise and then exploding without explanation. Sure, Java might write you a novel about what went wrong, complete with character development and plot twists, but at least it's trying to help. Meanwhile, C is over there like "something broke somewhere, good luck finding it, sucker!" The cognitive dissonance is chef's kiss perfect. It's like complaining your doctor gives too much information while preferring the mechanic who just shrugs and says "car bad."

Content MY CHILD WILL efficiently and responsibly allocate memory in C P malloc(9999999g

Content STOP DOING COMPUTER SCIENCE Computers were supposed to solve math, NOT to be programmed C is a LETTER, not a language Wanna print () something? Write it in a PAPER with a PEN "I'm writing a recursive method with threads to optimize the CPU usage in a 0.02" THIS IS A NONSENSICAL STATEMENT MADE BY DERANGED PEOPLE Look at what PROGRAMMERS have been demanding your respect for, after all the led lights we put in their computers: (This is real COMPUTER SCIENCE, done by real COMPUTER SCIENTISTS): edev a EDEV BASEename os.nakedirs (edev, existok True) syntax error on token come expected after t deac sir CONDALBASEenane"etcConda. os-nakedarstacta-dir. exist ok True? tok-True con, actidir'edevon.sh" coff deac dir redevotfash It not os.path.15link (con): os.symLink(BIN'edevon.sh', con) if not Syntar error, insert 7 to complete MethodDecari O Sintix error on tokion expected after this tok FUNNY COLORED LETTERS " the method ficAnalysiso is a 178 COMPILATION ERRORS????? A FAKE TEAPOT YOU CAN'T USE IF PROGRAMMING WAS REAL HOW COME NOBODY THOUGHT IN DOING while(true) print(money); THEY PLAYED US FOR ABSOLUTE FOOLS ProdrammerHumor.io

Content LOGIN .com SIGN IN

Content 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 You've heard of the 2-value boolean The 3-value boolean wich has null Even perhaps the 4-value boolean Now, for a limited time only The FIVE value boolean! it's the "Foolean" type Foolean Yup Nope Dunno Huh Yeet true false null I0 failure function that returns a Foolean

Content One upvote on reddit One upvote on Stack Overflow